<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for shadesofgray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com</link>
	<description>Copyright law from black to white and everything in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:23:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Vernor v. Autodesk and the First Sale DoctrineGoing, Going, Gone? by Hot Topics In IP Litigation Program Coming to D.C. &#124; IP In BRIEF: Developments in Copyright and Trademark Litigation</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2011/05/24/vernor-v-autodesk-and-the-first-sale-doctrinegoing-going-gone/comment-page-1/#comment-11907</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Topics In IP Litigation Program Coming to D.C. &#124; IP In BRIEF: Developments in Copyright and Trademark Litigation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=471#comment-11907</guid>
		<description>[...] fine lawyer and the author of the copyright blog Shades of Gray. Her very useful post on Vernor is here. Naomi also serves with Dan Quick and I as co-chair on the Copyright Subcommittee of the IP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fine lawyer and the author of the copyright blog Shades of Gray. Her very useful post on Vernor is here. Naomi also serves with Dan Quick and I as co-chair on the Copyright Subcommittee of the IP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Memoriam  Schelle Simcox by Stephanie Simcox</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2011/05/18/in-memoriam-schelle-simcox/comment-page-1/#comment-11775</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Simcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=469#comment-11775</guid>
		<description>Thank you Naomi, I know that Schelle treasured your friendship and would be honored by this.
Steph Simcox (sister)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Naomi, I know that Schelle treasured your friendship and would be honored by this.<br />
Steph Simcox (sister)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Game On!Viacom, YouTube Briefs On File in 2nd Circuit by Is YouTube a Service Provider or Content Provider? &#124; Copyhype</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2011/03/31/game-onviacom-youtube-briefs-on-file-in-2nd-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-10541</link>
		<dc:creator>Is YouTube a Service Provider or Content Provider? &#124; Copyhype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=443#comment-10541</guid>
		<description>[...] briefs for Viacom&#8217;s appeal against the District Court&#8217;s decision in its lawsuit against YouTube have been filed. Last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] briefs for Viacom&#8217;s appeal against the District Court&#8217;s decision in its lawsuit against YouTube have been filed. Last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Game On!Viacom, YouTube Briefs On File in 2nd Circuit by Friday&#8217;s Endnotes &#8211; 04/01/11 &#124; Copyhype</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2011/03/31/game-onviacom-youtube-briefs-on-file-in-2nd-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-10369</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday&#8217;s Endnotes &#8211; 04/01/11 &#124; Copyhype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=443#comment-10369</guid>
		<description>[...] Game on! Viacom, YouTube briefs on file in 2nd Circuit — The popular video site submitted its appellate brief yesterday. Shades of Gray has links to the document, as well as Viacom&#8217;s opening brief and the numerous amici briefs filed in the case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Game on! Viacom, YouTube briefs on file in 2nd Circuit — The popular video site submitted its appellate brief yesterday. Shades of Gray has links to the document, as well as Viacom&#8217;s opening brief and the numerous amici briefs filed in the case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guestbook by Naomi Jane Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/guestbook/comment-page-1/#comment-9983</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Jane Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02ec907.netsolhost.com/shadesofgray/?page_id=8#comment-9983</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, and for taking the time to read Shades of Gray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, and for taking the time to read Shades of Gray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Golan&#8217;s Heights Supremes to Hear Constitutional Challenge to Copyright Restoration by General Global Week in Review 21 March 11 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2011/03/16/golans-heights-supremes-to-hear-constitutional-challenge-to-copyright-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-9934</link>
		<dc:creator>General Global Week in Review 21 March 11 from IP Think Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=341#comment-9934</guid>
		<description>[...] Court grants cert: Golan v. Holder (Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog) (Shades of Gray) (IP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court grants cert: Golan v. Holder (Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog) (Shades of Gray) (IP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guestbook by Richard Roman Shum, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/guestbook/comment-page-1/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Roman Shum, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://02ec907.netsolhost.com/shadesofgray/?page_id=8#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this site!  You&#039;ve really kicked me in the proverbial butt to do some more writing myself.  Amidst such a frenzied cacophony of voices in the copyright arena, it&#039;s still so seldom one finds a temperate intelligent perspective.  Kudos &amp; keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this site!  You&#8217;ve really kicked me in the proverbial butt to do some more writing myself.  Amidst such a frenzied cacophony of voices in the copyright arena, it&#8217;s still so seldom one finds a temperate intelligent perspective.  Kudos &amp; keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sharing Isn&#8217;t CaringCourt Shuts Down Lime Wire File-Sharing Service by Online Global Week in Review 29 October 2010 from IP Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2010/10/27/sharing-isnt-caringcourt-shuts-down-lime-wire-file-sharing-service/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Global Week in Review 29 October 2010 from IP Think Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=314#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>[...] Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Mildred RuleKeeping Clients&#8217; Email Out of the Spotlight When Litigation Hits the Fan by Laurence M. Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2010/07/01/the-mildred-rulekeeping-clients-email-out-of-the-spotlight-when-litigation-hits-the-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence M. Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=291#comment-4346</guid>
		<description>Dear Naomi, 
sound advice, well articulated. Lawyers who advise their clients ahead of time not to engage in foolish behavior may greatly decrease their clientele, but I admire you for working outside the establishment to make life better and simpler for all of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Naomi,<br />
sound advice, well articulated. Lawyers who advise their clients ahead of time not to engage in foolish behavior may greatly decrease their clientele, but I admire you for working outside the establishment to make life better and simpler for all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Mildred RuleKeeping Clients&#8217; Email Out of the Spotlight When Litigation Hits the Fan by Naomi Jane Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2010/07/01/the-mildred-rulekeeping-clients-email-out-of-the-spotlight-when-litigation-hits-the-fan/comment-page-1/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Jane Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/?p=291#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>Vicki, thanks for your comment.  You&#039;re absolutely right - both about the inherently quicker (and less reflective) nature of email communications, and the fact that younger employees, who have grown up with the technology (the &quot;digital natives&quot;) are less sensitive to the perils of letting emails fly.  I believe YouTube&#039;s founders were not long out of college when grappling with these complex copyright issues over email, and the email containing the &quot;steal it, haha&quot; quote was sent at 1 a.m. (according to its timestamp) - not the best time of day for contemplative writing.  But that is a reality of doing business in an Internet start-up, and it is part of counsel&#039;s job to find the balance between fostering the development of more disciplined communications practices without stifling the employees or the business itself.  Happy 4th!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki, thanks for your comment.  You&#8217;re absolutely right &#8211; both about the inherently quicker (and less reflective) nature of email communications, and the fact that younger employees, who have grown up with the technology (the &#8220;digital natives&#8221;) are less sensitive to the perils of letting emails fly.  I believe YouTube&#8217;s founders were not long out of college when grappling with these complex copyright issues over email, and the email containing the &#8220;steal it, haha&#8221; quote was sent at 1 a.m. (according to its timestamp) &#8211; not the best time of day for contemplative writing.  But that is a reality of doing business in an Internet start-up, and it is part of counsel&#8217;s job to find the balance between fostering the development of more disciplined communications practices without stifling the employees or the business itself.  Happy 4th!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
